Current:Home > MarketsThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -WealthPro Academy
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
View
Date:2025-04-14 18:31:33
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (6)
prev:'Most Whopper
next:Sam Taylor
Related
- Jay Kanter, veteran Hollywood producer and Marlon Brando agent, dies at 97: Reports
- What Ariana Madix's Vanderpump Rules Co-Stars Really Think of Her New Man Daniel Wai
- How Trump’s ‘Secret Science’ Rule Would Put Patients’ Privacy at Risk
- Demi Moore and Emma Heming Willis Fiercely Defend Tallulah Willis From Body-Shamers
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Government Shutdown Raises Fears of Scientific Data Loss, Climate Research Delays
- Megan Fox Says She's Never, Ever Loved Her Body
- New York City’s Solar Landfill Plan Finds Eager Energy Developers
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- A Surge of Climate Lawsuits Targets Human Rights, Damage from Fossil Fuels
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Native Americans left out of 'deaths of despair' research
- Arctic’s 2nd-Warmest Year Puts Wildlife, Coastal Communities Under Pressure
- Police officer who shot 11-year-old Mississippi boy suspended without pay
- 'Meet me at the gate': Watch as widow scatters husband's ashes, BASE jumps into canyon
- Florida police officer relieved of duty after dispute with deputy over speeding
- From a green comet to cancer-sniffing ants, we break down the science headlines
- Nicole Richie Shares Rare Glimpse of 15-Year-Old Daughter Harlow in Family Photo
Recommendation
Family of explorer who died in the Titan sub implosion seeks $50M-plus in wrongful death lawsuit
That Global Warming Hiatus? It Never Happened. Two New Studies Explain Why.
FDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men
Climate Activist Escapes Conviction in Action That Shut Down 5 Pipelines
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Hidden Viruses And How To Prevent The Next Pandemic
Blake Shelton Has the Best Reaction to Reba McEntire Replacing Him on The Voice
Portland Bans New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in Stand Against Climate Change